ChartographyBrowse 284 families
Chartography
Can the model extract and reason over information in images or documents?
- Domain
- Vision
- Ranked models
- 4
- Reported values
- 4
- Reports
- 2 · lab
- Direction
- Higher is better
- Status
- Version not specified
Rankings
Best reported score per model across effort settings
| # | Model | Best setting | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic | maxcost n/a1 value · Sep 22 · source | 89.0% |
| 2 | Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | reportedcost n/a1 value · Sep 22 · source | 88.4% |
| 3 | Claude Opus 5Anthropic | reportedcost n/a1 value · Sep 22 · source | 83.4% |
| 4 | DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeekOW | reportedcost n/a1 value · Sep 10 · source | 78.9% |
Effort curve
Score vs. reported cost. Lines connect complete sweeps only.
Definition and comparison boundarypublic methodology
Can the model extract and reason over information in images or documents?
Visual perception and multimodal reasoning under the reported protocol. Higher is better. The value is the percentage reported in this lab's table.
Harness, tools, prompts, attempt count, and benchmark version can materially change the result. Compare within one reporting context.
DeepSeek's official V4.1-Flash release table; exact source label Chartography (w/tools) retained. Anthropic's release table reports the exact with-tools scores; it does not print the task revision, harness, or model effort for the comparison cells beyond its general Opus 5.5 adaptive-Max note.
Method / source ↗