Kimi Code Bench v2 (Internal)Browse 284 families
Kimi Code Bench v2 (Internal)
Can the model complete substantial programming work under this benchmark's agent setup?
- Domain
- Coding
- Ranked models
- 4
- Reported values
- 4
- Reports
- 1 · lab
- Direction
- Higher is better
- Status
- Version not specified
Rankings
Best reported score per model across effort settings
| # | Model | Best setting | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5.5OpenAI | xhighcost n/a1 value · Jul 22 · source | 69.0% |
| 2 | Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | xhighcost n/a1 value · Jul 22 · source | 67.4% |
| 3 | Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AIOW | thinkingcost n/a1 value · Jul 22 · source | 62.0% |
| 4 | Kimi K2.6Moonshot AIOW | thinkingcost n/a1 value · Jul 22 · source | 50.9% |
Effort curve
Score vs. reported cost. Lines connect complete sweeps only.
Definition and comparison boundaryinternal methodology
Can the model complete substantial programming work under this benchmark's agent setup?
Software implementation, debugging, or repository work under the published evaluation protocol. Higher is better. The value is the percentage reported in this lab's table.
This is a publisher-defined internal evaluation. The task set or grading details are not fully public, so treat it as directional evidence.
Kimi Code CLI with thinking enabled, temperature 1.0, top-p 0.95, and 262,144-token context; GPT-5.5 used Codex xhigh and Claude Opus 4.8 used Claude Code xhigh.
Method / source ↗