CyberGymBrowse 284 families
CyberGym
Can the model diagnose or complete difficult cybersecurity tasks?
Version / measure
- Domain
- Cybersecurity
- Ranked models
- 5
- Reported values
- 5
- Reports
- 2 · lab
- Direction
- Higher is better
- Status
- Version not specified
Rankings
Best reported score per model across effort settings
| # | Model | Best setting | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeekOW | reportedcost n/a1 value · Sep 10 · source | 88.1% |
| 2 | Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | reportedcost n/a1 value · Jul 31 · source | 83.1% |
| 3 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731DeepSeekOW | maxcost n/a1 value · Jul 31 · source | 76.7% |
| 4 | DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeekOW | reportedcost n/a1 value · Jul 31 · source | 52.7% |
| 5 | DeepSeek-V4-FlashDeepSeekOW | reportedcost n/a1 value · Jul 31 · source | 38.7% |
Effort curve
Score vs. reported cost. Lines connect complete sweeps only.
No cost-linked effort sweep for this version.
Definition and comparison boundarypublic methodology
Can the model diagnose or complete difficult cybersecurity tasks?
Security analysis or exploitation under a controlled evaluation environment. Higher is better. The value is the percentage reported in this lab's table.
Harness, tools, prompts, attempt count, and benchmark version can materially change the result. Compare within one reporting context.
DeepSeek's official V4.1-Flash release table; no pass metric, task revision, or harness is printed, so this remains a separate provider benchmark definition.
Method / source ↗