IMOAnswerBenchBrowse 284 families

IMOAnswerBench

Can the model solve difficult problems that require more than factual recall?

Version / measure
Domain
Reasoning
Ranked models
14
Reported values
17
Reports
3 · lab
Direction
Higher is better
Status
Version not specified

Rankings

Best reported score per model across effort settings

14 models
#ModelBest settingScore
1GLM-5.2Z.aiOWmaxcost n/a1 value · Jun 16 · source91.0%
2Qwen3.7-MaxQwenreportedcost n/a1 value · Jun 16 · source90.0%
3DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeekOWreportedcost n/a1 value · Jun 16 · source89.8%
4Claude Opus 4.5Anthropicreportedcost n/a1 value · Apr 21 · source84.0%
5GLM-5.1Z.aiOWreportedcost n/a1 value · Jun 16 · source83.8%
6Claude Opus 4.8Anthropicreportedcost n/a1 value · Jun 16 · source83.5%
7Gemini 3.1 ProGooglereportedcost n/a1 value · Jun 16 · source81.0%
8Qwen3.5-397B-A17BQwenreportedcost n/a1 value · Apr 21 · source80.9%
9Qwen3.6-27BQwenreportedcost n/a1 value · Apr 21 · source80.8%
10Qwen3.5-27BQwenreportedcost n/a2 values · Apr 21 · source79.9%

Effort curve

Score vs. reported cost. Lines connect complete sweeps only.

0 values
No cost-linked effort sweep for this version.
Definition and comparison boundarypublic methodology

Can the model solve difficult problems that require more than factual recall?

Multi-step reasoning on academic, mathematical, or abstract problems. Higher is better. The value is the percentage reported in this lab's table.

Harness, tools, prompts, attempt count, and benchmark version can materially change the result. Compare within one reporting context.

Method / source ↗