QwenWebBenchBrowse 284 families
QwenWebBench
Can the model complete substantial programming work under this benchmark's agent setup?
Version / measure
- Domain
- Coding
- Ranked models
- 8
- Reported values
- 11
- Reports
- 2 · lab
- Direction
- Higher is better
- Status
- Version not specified
Rankings
Best reported score per model across effort settings
| # | Model | Best setting | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic | reportedcost n/a1 value · Apr 21 · source | 1536 |
| 2 | Qwen3.6-27BQwen | reportedcost n/a1 value · Apr 21 · source | 1487 |
| 3 | Qwen3.6-35B-A3BQwen | reportedcost n/a2 values · Apr 21 · source | 1397 |
| 4 | Gemma4-31BGoogle | reportedcost n/a2 values · Apr 21 · source | 1197 |
| 5 | Qwen3.5-397B-A17BQwen | reportedcost n/a1 value · Apr 21 · source | 1186 |
| 6 | Gemma4-26B-A4BGoogle | reportedcost n/a1 value · Apr 15 · source | 1178 |
| 7 | Qwen3.5-27BQwen | reportedcost n/a2 values · Apr 21 · source | 1068 |
| 8 | Qwen3.5-35B-A3BQwen | reportedcost n/a1 value · Apr 15 · source | 978 |
Effort curve
Score vs. reported cost. Lines connect complete sweeps only.
No cost-linked effort sweep for this version.
Definition and comparison boundaryinternal methodology
Can the model complete substantial programming work under this benchmark's agent setup?
Software implementation, debugging, or repository work under the published evaluation protocol. Higher is better. This benchmark reports points rather than percent correct.
This is a publisher-defined internal evaluation. The task set or grading details are not fully public, so treat it as directional evidence.
Internal bilingual front-end code-generation benchmark with seven categories, auto-render plus multimodal judge, and BT/Elo rating.
Method / source ↗