HMMT NovBrowse 284 families

HMMT Nov

Can the model solve difficult problems that require more than factual recall?

Version / measure
Domain
Reasoning
Ranked models
8
Reported values
11
Reports
2 · lab
Direction
Higher is better
Status
Version not specified

Rankings

Best reported score per model across effort settings

8 models
#ModelBest settingScore
1Claude Opus 4.5Anthropicreportedcost n/a1 value · Apr 21 · source93.3%
2Qwen3.5-397B-A17BQwenreportedcost n/a1 value · Apr 21 · source92.7%
3Qwen3.6-27BQwenreportedcost n/a1 value · Apr 21 · source90.7%
4Qwen3.5-27BQwenreportedcost n/a2 values · Apr 21 · source89.8%
5Qwen3.5-35B-A3BQwenreportedcost n/a1 value · Apr 15 · source89.2%
6Qwen3.6-35B-A3BQwenreportedcost n/a2 values · Apr 21 · source89.1%
7Gemma4-31BGooglereportedcost n/a2 values · Apr 21 · source87.5%
8Gemma4-26B-A4BGooglereportedcost n/a1 value · Apr 15 · source87.5%

Effort curve

Score vs. reported cost. Lines connect complete sweeps only.

0 values
No cost-linked effort sweep for this version.
Definition and comparison boundarypublic methodology

Can the model solve difficult problems that require more than factual recall?

Multi-step reasoning on academic, mathematical, or abstract problems. Higher is better. The value is the percentage reported in this lab's table.

Harness, tools, prompts, attempt count, and benchmark version can materially change the result. Compare within one reporting context.

Method / source ↗