Phage–plasmid co-evolutionBrowse 284 families
Phage–plasmid co-evolution
Can the model reason accurately about difficult scientific material?
Version / measure
- Domain
- Science
- Ranked models
- 1
- Reported values
- 1
- Reports
- 1 · lab
- Direction
- Lower is better
- Status
- Latest stable
Rankings
Best reported score per model across effort settings
| # | Model | Best setting | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | reportedcost n/a1 value · Sep 3 · source | 12.58 |
Effort curve
Score vs. reported cost. Lines connect complete sweeps only.
No cost-linked effort sweep for this version.
Definition and comparison boundaryinternal methodology
Can the model reason accurately about difficult scientific material?
Scientific knowledge and reasoning under the benchmark's published question set. Lower is better. Negative log-likelihood for OpenAI's helpful-only Astra checkpoint.
This is a publisher-defined internal evaluation. The task set or grading details are not fully public, so treat it as directional evidence.
OpenAI prints NLL 12.58 for the helpful-only Astra model and 13.13 for ordinary Astra on the same unpublished sequential phage–plasmid evaluation; the indicative threshold is 9.40.
Method / source ↗