MMLUBrowse 284 families

MMLU

Can the model produce useful work in a professional knowledge-work setting?

Version / measure
Domain
Knowledge Work
Ranked models
10
Reported values
14
Reports
1 · lab
Direction
Higher is better
Status
Version not specified

Rankings

Best reported score per model across effort settings

10 models
#ModelBest settingScore
1Gemini 3.1 ProGooglehighcost n/a1 value · Apr 26 · source91.0%
2Claude Opus 4.6Anthropicmaxcost n/a1 value · Apr 26 · source89.1%
3DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeekOWmaxcost n/a3 values · Apr 26 · source87.5%
4GPT-5.4OpenAIxhighcost n/a1 value · Apr 26 · source87.5%
5Kimi K2.6Moonshot AIOWreportedcost n/a1 value · Apr 26 · source87.1%
6DeepSeek-V4-FlashDeepSeekOWhighcost n/a3 values · Apr 26 · source86.4%
7GLM-5.1Z.aiOWreportedcost n/a1 value · Apr 26 · source86.0%
8DeepSeek-V4-Pro-BaseDeepSeekOWreportedcost n/a1 value · Apr 26 · source73.5%
9DeepSeek-V4-Flash-BaseDeepSeekOWreportedcost n/a1 value · Apr 26 · source68.3%
10DeepSeek-V3.2-BaseDeepSeekOWreportedcost n/a1 value · Apr 26 · source65.5%

Effort curve

Score vs. reported cost. Lines connect complete sweeps only.

0 values
No cost-linked effort sweep for this version.
Definition and comparison boundarypublic methodology

Can the model produce useful work in a professional knowledge-work setting?

Professional analysis, document, finance, office, or domain-specific tasks. Higher is better. The value is the percentage reported in this lab's table.

Harness, tools, prompts, attempt count, and benchmark version can materially change the result. Compare within one reporting context.

Base and mode tables are 5-shot EM; frontier comparison preserves the source's named effort settings.

Method / source ↗