HealthBenchBrowse 284 families

HealthBench

Can the model produce useful work in a professional knowledge-work setting?

Version / measure
Domain
Knowledge Work
Ranked models
7
Reported values
7
Reports
1 · lab
Direction
Higher is better
Status
Latest stable

Rankings

Best reported score per model across effort settings

7 models
#ModelBest settingScore
1GPT-6 AstraOpenAIreportedcost n/a1 value · Sep 3 · source58.3%
2GPT-5.6 SolOpenAIreportedcost n/a1 value · Sep 3 · source57.0%
3GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAIreportedcost n/a1 value · Sep 3 · source57.0%
4GPT-5.5OpenAIreportedcost n/a1 value · Sep 3 · source56.5%
5GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAIreportedcost n/a1 value · Sep 3 · source55.8%
6GPT-6 LunaOpenAIreportedcost n/a1 value · Sep 22 · source54.5%
7GPT-6 SolOpenAIreportedcost n/a1 value · Sep 22 · source53.2%

Effort curve

Score vs. reported cost. Lines connect complete sweeps only.

0 values
No cost-linked effort sweep for this version.
Definition and comparison boundarypublic methodology

Can the model produce useful work in a professional knowledge-work setting?

Professional analysis, document, finance, office, or domain-specific tasks. Higher is better. Length-adjusted score on the 0-100 scale reported by OpenAI.

Harness, tools, prompts, attempt count, and benchmark version can materially change the result. Compare within one reporting context.

OpenAI's September 22 appendix corrects the earlier Astra value to 58.3. The table prints length-adjusted score followed by unadjusted score and mean response length in characters: GPT-6 Astra 58.3 (60.8, 977); GPT-6 Sol 53.2 (47.1, 977); GPT-6 Luna 54.5 (50.0, 1255). Earlier GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 comparison values are retained from the same report: 56.5 (58.4, 2313); 57.0 (55.6, 1764); 57.0 (58.7, 2285); 55.8 (55.4, 1930).

Method / source ↗